Wednesday, December 6, 2006

Reality TV

For a while, I kept thinking that “reality” TV couldn’t possibly get any worse, given our current selection of programming. On any given day, you can choose from watching a spoiled 16 year old girl’s birthday party (hilariously parodied on South Park, I might add), a group of 7 or 8 stereotyped caricatures living in the “real world”, a bunch of D-list celebrities living together in a house, the same D-list celebrities getting the crap scared out of them in a supposedly haunted house, or a has-been rapper picking out a new girlfriend. Apparently it doesn’t matter whether the shows are in fact “reality”- the only prerequisite now seems to be entertainment.

However, I was reading the news online the other day, and stumbled across this gem. It could be worse, I guess- we could be subjected to what they put on TV in the Netherlands. Yikes.


http://www.cnn.com/2006/SHOWBIZ/TV/12/05/television.dutch.reut/index.html

Video Games

On the topic of pop culture as it relates to video games- I’ve noticed the trend seems to be towards activities you could actually get out and do, but choose not to because apparently simulating them with a game controller is so much more fun. I thought a lot about games such as the Sims and the website Second Life, but these are actually interesting in that they allow you to change your identity and “interact” with others in ways that you wouldn’t necessarily do so otherwise.

The games that I was mostly thinking about for this entry simulate activities you could easily do without a controller and game console. Obviously, Dance Dance Revolution is the first example that comes to mind, but it at least has merit in the fact that you get a workout while you’re doing it. The activities simulated in other games have gotten increasingly ridiculous, though, especially with the new Nintendo Wii remote that allows you to simulate swinging a baseball bat, tennis racket, or golf club. I guess this is far more amusing than actually going outside and playing a game of baseball or tennis or going golfing with your friends.

Perhaps the best example, though, is the Guitar Hero game for PlayStation, which I heard about over Thanksgiving from one of my friends. Apparently you “play” by pressing buttons on a controller that looks like a guitar, and can do competing “guitar solos” with your friends, among other activities.

Or hey, you could always be old-fashioned and just take guitar lessons like people used to do back in the good old days…

iPOd's

While sitting on the metro on my way back from a job interview at 4 PM on a Friday, I noticed a five men walk on together. Each man had those distinctive white headphones on, but continued their conversation with each other. Was their music really that important, or has the ipod become so popular that it has become OK to engage in conversation while listening to your ipod.

On that same metro ride, in my car alone, I saw 16 people, in five stops with an ipod. These people ranged from kids coming home from school, to young professionals, and even to people in their 40's and 50's. Why is the ipod so appealing? Why are people willing to pay anywhere from $150-$350 in order to obtain one, when they can purchase a different mp3 player for less than half of that price. Granted, ipods are very user friendly, but it does say alot about our society and what "is in" and what "people have to have".

Tuesday, December 5, 2006

The Election

And the front page of USA Today featured the breakup of Britney Spears and Kevin Federline. I wish I still had the copy, but it’s true. It just shows how pervasive celebrity and entertainment is in our society. If USA Today has that on their front page and they reach millions of readers, then I imagine that it means that they believed people would be more interested in reading about Britney Spears’s divorce than the early results of the midterm election. We seem to value entertainment above the general news.

The top TV ratings from Neilsen’s shows something about the way we watch TV. For the week of November 20, you see that the top two shows on Broadcast television were Desperate Housewives and CSI:Miami.

Nielsen’s Top TV Ratings Nov. 20:

http://www.nielsenmedia.com/nc/portal/site/Public/menuitem.43afce2fac27e890311ba0a347a062a0/?show=%2FFilters%2FPublic%2Ftop_tv_ratings%2Fbroadcast_tv&selOneIndex=0&vgnextoid=9e4df9669fa14010VgnVCM100000880a260aRCRD

Another observation I made that may fit into this arena is the Mark Foley scandal. Foley got caught sending elicit e-mails to young male pages in the White House. It will forever go down in infamy as one of huge things that brought down the Republican rule in the House and Senate. Most exit polls showed that the greatest percentage of people voted based on their views of “corruption and scandals.” Foley’s scandal and Webb’s macaca statement both got a lot of press and were all over the web. There were two American Forums this year devoted to the future of the news and what the internet and sites such as YouTube have to do with it. The overexposure of both elements on the internet was probably the end for the Republicans and the beginning of a new era of people directly interacting with pop culture.

To the Left, To the Left

TO THE LEFT, TO THE LEFT
Over Thanksgiving break, while members of my family were starting to eat the food laid out before them, someone asked where the roast beef was. At least four people responded, “To the left, to the left.”

At a store once again over Thanksgiving break, I overheard other people engaging in a similar type of conversation. A young woman asked her friend where the shoes were, and her friend responded, “To the right, to the right.”

This is the first lyric heard in Beyonce Knowles’s song “Irreplaceable,” and it is just as addictive to people as “SexyBack.”

Starbucks

In many ways Starbucks is the embodiment of a new sort of culture permeating our society. It at once stands for the many attributes marking the defining characteristics of pop-culture and continually seeks out the boundaries for a new understanding of this. In a way Starbucks promotes, and, ideally represents a democratic accessibility to coffee and thus opens itself to the masses. Given its rather generous payment and benefits package it attracts a variety of workers from across the demographic landscape. But the essence of Starbucks- more than its brand, or coffee, or dense population- is the aesthetic landscape painted on the interior of every store. One begins to feel, upon entering, that an experience is occurring and this is precisely what is so interesting about Starbucks: while waiting for their coffee, patrons can relax to Bob Marley or A Charlie Brown Christmas or read up on Starbucks latest efforts at corporate responsibility. One gets the sense that at Starbucks something is occurring between the patron and the store, and that conversation speaks volumes about what Starbucks aims to get out its consumer and what consumers are willing to accept from Starbucks. It is a relationship that fuels the other, and a mutual acceptance on both sides to nurture this evolution.

This is evident in the proliferation of CD’s strategically placed within Starbucks. In front of the register, in a rack directly behind the register, on the stand where one picks up drinks and over the speakers, there is always music in Starbucks. It is loud enough to be noticed, but not so loud that it is distracting. Sometimes it is hip and on the cutting edge, sometimes it is low-key and marked by a sensibility that appeals to both the 20 year old would be poet and the early 60’s management boss who fondly remembers the day when this was cutting edge and avant-garde. Both though,can appreciate in Starbucks a quality one looks for in a coffee-house: a non-offensive space where ideas are embraced and a collective in formed. But most importantly Starbucks represents a space where one can feign a sway into the alternative without ever having to be alternative. Leafing through the CD’s on display the defining feature, more so than the fact that most CD’s are compilations of some sort, is that Nonesuch is the most common label for non-compilation CD’s. Nonesuch is a subsidiary of Time-Warner and is most notorious for its coup in landing the band alt-country/rock band Wilco and for also housing avant-garde stalwarts Kronos Quartet and Steve Reich. Nonesuch is a label that is purposefully appealed to a certain demographic and Starbucks does as much to reinforce that demographic. And this relationship is indicative of the kind of relationship Starbucks promotes in its stores, where patrons are representing a particular culture and embracing a particular culture and ultimately reinterpreting that culture.

So the next time you visit Starbucks keep an eye, or ear, open for the cultural conversation. What is Starbucks saying about our culture? And what does our willingness to join such conversation say about us as a people?

Monday, December 4, 2006

Facebook

In a previous post, I had mentioned the new internet age of pop culture. Being a college student in 2006, there is one thing that stands out more than anything else, facebook (and myspace for that matter too). Sitting in the Anderson Computer Lab, I have full sight of multiple computers, 13 to be exact. As soon as I sit down, I see a girl in the front row perusing facebook. Facebook is a program that allows you to “friend” people online, view pictures of them, as well as various information about them.

Anyway, this one girl is on the site, looking around. Another girl, who apparently is her friend is sitting next to her, doing something else. The girl searching facebook all of a sudden turns to her friend, and says in a load enough voice, at least so I can hear, “Look who he hooked up with last night”, in reference to a guy that they knew. Neither could believe that the two hooked up, and started a search for more evidence, or pictures. This is called facebook stalking.

The facebook website has become a pop phenomenon. People will be out at bars, and see someone who they have never met, yet they are facebook friends with. Facebook lingo has even entered mainstream college culture. It is pop to go “facebooking”, or as the girl the computer lab’s case, facebook stalking.

Observing in the Student Center

In a generation filled with MTV, VH1, Ipods, Cell Phones, and laptops, it is very hard to distinguish what is pop, versus what has become a norm. For example, while sitting in the marketplace, a common student gathering area on the campus of American University, there are about 20 tables, none of which are empty. At least 14 of those tables have at least one laptop resting on them, some even have three or four. At the table to my right are four girls, with four laptops (2 macs, 1 dell, 1 HP), four cell phones, and a lone ipod nano. I was able to see that one of these girls had what looked like a paper in progress up on her screen, but was talking with people on instant messenger at the same time.

At the table directly in front of me, three guys crowd around a laptop, all eating their newly purchased box lunches and checking out various clips on YouTube.com. This is not the first You Tube gathering that I have witnessed, in fact, I have been part of one myself. You Tube has gained quite a bit of momentum and has become a commonly discussed topic as of late. These guys happen to be watching a video of someone dancing, and making a fool of himself. The popularity of internet sites such as AIM and You Tube beg the question, is there a new internet pop culture, or has the internet itself become pop culture.

Sunday, December 3, 2006

Tryst

I am now ob serving at Tryst, a local DC coffee house and that is equal parts funk, hip and cool. In many ways Tryst embodies the elements of pop-culture. It is a fertile meeting ground of those seeking a hip, chic modern coffee shop that serves as much coffee as it does access to how we have come to appropriate meaning on spaces within our culture and what that says about the popular habits and customs that arise from such meanings.

In the area where I am sitting, a cul-de-sac of couches, there are four people working on iBook’s. Each is of the MacBook variety (defined by its white casing), which is the most commonly seen computer in public spaces. Sleek, easily accessible, utilitarian in nature and captivating in their minimalism, iBook’s are a powerful testament to the power of cool in our society. It is most certainly cool to have an iMac and even cooler to be seen with one. This particular night there are 17 people working on computers out of a total of 48 in Tryst, and of those13 are working on iMac’s. Most people were actively engaged in whatever work they were doing on their computer, but several, including a few in the area where I was observing were using them for other purposes, mainly listening to music and to occupy an otherwise empty seat on a couch. And this brings up an interesting question: when did computers become an item of necessity at coffee shops? Is it because computers present a more advanced method by which to write? Have the social implications of going to the coffee shop changed? Or is it that the very nature of the “coffee shop” itself has changed? I, by no means have the answers, but in observing the ways people use computers it becomes clear that a different and new dynamic exists. .

This much is evident in my circle. To my left sits a woman who is not only working on her iBook, but also talking on the phone. I can discern that she is either fighting with her boyfriend, or relating her current angst with work. Her conversation lasts for about eight minutes, and immediately after hanging up proceeds to put on her headphones and set back working on her computer as if nothing happened. Her facial expression suggests otherwise, though. Traditionalists decry the use of cell-phones in public, and the question of why people feel the need to make their private conversations public is certainly valid, but the use of cell-phones attests more to the evolving relationship patrons share with their favorite coffee joint, and to the ways in which those spaces are being appropriated.

To her right is another woman speaking on her phone. This conversation is dramatically lighter than the other, but annoying enough that several people shoot stares of consternation. Well understood. Nevertheless she cheerfully chats as she cuts out what appear to be nametags out of a stack several inches high. What was the communal coffee table has become her personal office.

In our circle are four other people engaged in two separate conversations. One between two younger women, recently out of school, and catching up for the first time in some months; the other between a woman in her late twenties and a gentleman in his early thirties, who met only recently as she volunteered her cell phone to take a picture of his oversized cappuccino- it will be his wall paper he tells her and she volunteers to text the picture in what seems to be her attempt to strike up a conversation, she has been eyeing since he arrived five or so minutes prior. They take several pictures and shift into the type of conversation that might occur when people meet in this type of social setting, easy, laid back and causal. They discuss mostly their travels and she inches closer and closer, until only her laptop separates them, at which point she shows him some pictures she has recently uploaded. They talk for about 30 minutes and then she departs and he stares around with a look of one who knows he’s just tapped into some rich oil. He then commences to read a book on learning behaviors.

The two younger lady’s chat and catch up- their jobs, their boyfriends, what life after college is like, their common friends- and are the only people not using any sort of technology. As much as a coffee shop is a place where one goes to catch up and have a conversation with a friend, or a place to studying in some relative peace, or to read the paper, or to do work, or to meet people, it is a place where people feel free to articulate a vision of how they interact with what is assuredly an odd, but useful cultural prism. How the various people in my circle have decided to utilize the space is of their own choosing, yet there is an implicit understanding amongst all patrons that this is how the space functions: open and free, but bound in manner, yet always evolving to reflect the life and times of our culture. This night a Tryst said as much.

Open City

On Sunday November 12, I participated in an observation at Open City, a high ceiling coffee shop/French eatery located in Woodley Park. It is normally full with but a few tables open at a time. Tonight however, Open City was rather sparse.

Two women working on i-Books at popular coffee shop studying for the GRE, while drinking coffee out of oversized coffee cups. They stop every few minutes, chat, sip coffee and reengage themselves in their studies. They are wearing blue jeans and sweatshirts. Their table is located in the far right corner near the wall that divides the kitchen from the wooden chairs and tables spread about the floor. Several tables’ over sit three other women, exchanging phones to view text messages each has received. They continue this exchange for several minutes, laughing at comments sketched on the phone, grinning when one received is not of their liking.

One waitress is wearing a blue jean skirt, with spandex underneath and a studded black leather belt. A black tank-top is the choice of upper body wear with Dr. Martens on her feet. Another waitress, more decadently dressed is wearing knee-length jeans, rubber rain boot, tank-top and track jacket. Turquoise jewelry graces her neck and wrists and in conversation she mentions she recently graduated from Vanderbilt.

But what is most noticeable: glasses. Of the thirty-eight people in Open City this night, twenty-three are wearing glasses. Of those twenty-three, all are wearing what would be termed “fashion glasses.” That is, glasses that have a nuveau style, purpose, determination and look. Glasses that suggest the people wearing them are hip and part of a larger cultural conversation.

Borat

Over Thanksgiving, I finally saw Borat after hearing how awesome it was from everyone around me for nearly a month. Personally, I found the movie hilarious, and have also enjoyed reading about all the controversy surrounding it, as well as looking at it from an anthropological/pop culture perspective.

It’s truly amazing what people will do and say when they are put in front of a camera- especially the fraternity brothers who were told the film would never be seen in the United States (and are now filing suit), and the guy at the rodeo who with very little prodding revealed his opinions on the gay population.

Between the interviews in the film and the prevalence of “reality” TV, it seems as if the general public just wants to be on camera (often without considering the consequences and repercussions, as has been a major issue surrounding this movie). However, very few of them actually become famous, so what’s the motivation?

Bringing Sexy Back

While the song SexyBack by Justin Timberlake has been out since the summer, it wasn’t until I started doing this mass observation topic that I noticed the effect it has on people! I’ve heard it in many different places- the AU shuttle, the Eagle’s Nest, at bars, in stores while shopping, and on the radio while working at the Anderson-Centennial desk (still at least once a day, it seems). It’s kind of amazing that no matter where it’s playing, this song has a way of making people dance, not to mention creating a new phrase- everyone is now talking about “bringing sexy back”- whatever that may mean.

It seems to be particularly popular in fashion magazines like Lucky, InStyle, etc, who discuss ways in which consumers can “bring sexy back” with the perfect leggings, giant belt, pair of ankle boots, whatever. AU even used it during National Collegiate Alcohol Awareness Week- there were pledge sheets in Anderson-Centennial Hall in which you could promise to “bring sober back”.

I wasn’t sure exactly where to go with this- but still found it interesting. It’s not every day that you see the lyrics of one song permeate so many aspects of pop culture, especially considering how unoriginal and repetitive the lyrics are…